If President Trump drained the swamp, we would still be stuck in the muck.
Still waiting on leaders to fix health care? And how many decades have we listened to talk about fixing the education system? But, did you know that both these systems are suffering from the same problem?
We the People? We don’t know which way to turn. But even if we did, we can’t move forward because we’re stuck in the muck.
Health care, social security, the justice system, the environment, education, on and on — all the major social problems are being kicked down the road. And we are stuck in debt up to our eyeballs while our social safety net develops ever-widening holes.
In the health care debate, what aren’t we hearing?
“The physicians say the increased use of quality metrics to assess provider performance is having a negative impact on quality of care. Far fewer (22 percent) see quality metrics as having a positive impact on quality.
Nearly half (47 percent) of physicians and just over a quarter (27 percent) of nurse practitioners and physician assistants say the recent trends in healthcare are leading them to consider an earlier retirement.”
Physicians and teachers are facing the same problems.
Where we once had community hospitals (schools), we now have health care (charter) management organizations. They control a data-driven system with an eye towards cost-cutting through technology. The technology industry and health treatment (education market) industries are flourishing.
People? We aren’t doing so well. Not only are teens and middle-aged men killing themselves at alarming rates, Americans in general are not as happy as we once were.
We know we need to address heath care. But we seem unaware of how desperately we need to consider real education reform as a national priority.
If we can’t gain control of our own local school systems, what hope do we have of solving our other more complex problems?
When leaders put Standards Based Reforms (SBR) in federal education law, we were trapped in the education metrics of outcome-based reforms.
Once we drop the fallacy that Standards-Based Reforms are a silver bullet, true education reform will be possible.
The misconception is that setting “higher, better” standards improves schools. It doesn’t.
Do you know why No Child Left Behind (NCLB) didn’t improve schools? SBR. And the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) perpetuates the same problem. SBR.
“Now we risk setting national curriculum standards instead of recognizing that children need us to identify their individual strengths and weaknesses and work with them to attain a level of mastery of the classroom curriculum as outlined in a locally agreed upon instructional framework.
This isn’t a philosophy that gets away from being held accountable to a standard; it’s one that is responsible for meeting the needs of the individual student along with educational standards.” The Crucial Voice of the People
That is a description of standards-referenced education, not standards-based (NOT the Outcome-Based Theory).
But the country is stuck because our tax dollars for education continue to be spent on SBR, not invested in us.
“We’re stuck because our focus, our funding priorities, and our personal beliefs and attitudes are failing to serve our country.
We are stuck in the standardization of children ditch because we set test scores as our goal—in law and in the minds of Americans.” The Crucial Voice of the People
Metrics rule. Plus, we have not listened to people with a passion for teaching and compassion for children.
“In the last several years, with the continuing emphasis on using data to drive instruction, I find myself increasingly skeptical about what we do to ‘benefit’ students. …
Data seems to be the driver of much educational policy today, even when it means we force students into increased time with their weakest subjects, and excluding content that might intrigue them. We marvel at the lack of engagement while we simultaneously impose rigid interventions…
I’m very concerned that our fixation on data has become more important than the engagement of students in topics that might lead them to important self-realizations of competency… It often feels like teachers are working in a system designed for disengagement, while at the same time being evaluated on their skill at maintaining engagement! …
Regardless of my knowledge or enthusiasm, I’m still expected to march as a good soldier with what I see as an archaic system…
Our current models mean we–teachers, administrators, and students–fixate more on ‘grades’ than learning. I can no longer grow as an educator when I feel confined by parameters that fail to prioritize self-discovery and lifelong learning–for all of us.” — Cindy McDonald (A Now Retired Teacher)
We are losing compassionate and passionate public servants. Our public services are trapped in the metrics of Outcome-Based Reforms because we aren’t controlling how our money is spent.
The more automated our human services become, the less service we are providing to humans. People are getting frustrated and blaming the government.
But consider this. The government is not run by people representative of us. Our government is run by the rich, ultra-rich, and the greedy who are willing to look the other way when it comes to using our lawmaking process for their own benefit. Palms are being greased. The “grease” keeps the swamp slimy.
And it is the arrogance of these ultra-rich people, telling us what is best for us, that we should no longer tolerate.
We’re the ones that need to roll up our sleeves and drain the swamp.
In writing about the House of Representatives, James Madison said, “They in a word hold the purse” (Federalist No. 58).
The Constitution: Article I SECTION. 7 “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives…”
“The greater the power is, the shorter ought to be its duration” (Federalist No. 52: Madison). Thus, Article I SECTION. 2 “The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People…”
We need to control the purse…
“As the people are the only legitimate fountain of power” (Federalist No. 49: Madison), we are central to our own progress as a nation. And to restrain the House requires “above all the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America, a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it (Federalist No. 57: Madison).”
Call it an electoral revolt or call it an election revolution. Call it what you will. It is what our nation’s fathers directed us to do. It will nourish progress.