Standardized Tests

Standardized Tests (aka assessments, measures, sometimes included as “indicators”)

SUMMARY of inappropriate uses of standardized “achievement” tests include:

1) Evaluating schools because “both socioeconomic status and inherited academic aptitudes [individual abilities] reflect what children bring to school, not what they learn there,”

2) Evaluating teachers because of “shifting ability-levels of a teacher’s students” from year to year,

3) Promoting or grading students because these tests are only a limited “sample” of knowledge and skills not an “end of course test,” and

4) Making classroom instructional decisions because of the limited scope of the tests. If this limited information is used to shape instruction, it may result in the instruction being “off-target.”

SUMMARY of Ten “Must Know” Facts About Educational Testing

Fact 1. Educational tests are much less accurate than most parents believe.

A child’s test performance on a given day can be greatly influenced by both physical factors and emotional factors. In addition, the tests themselves only sample a child’s skills and knowledge, and this sampling is often far from sufficient.

Fact 2. Educational tests allow teachers to make inferences about a student’s unseen skills or knowledge, but these inferences may or may not be valid.

Fact 3. High-stakes tests, depending on the particular way they are constructed, can have a decisively positive or negative effect on a child’s education. When students’ performances on a test have important consequences for students (such as grade-to-grade promotion or diploma-denial) or for those students’ teachers (such as test-based evaluations of a school staff’s effectiveness), the test is referred to as a “high-stakes test.”

Fact 4. Achievement tests are intended to measure significant skills or bodies of knowledge that children should learn. A standardized aptitude test (like SAT and ACT), on the other hand, is intended to predict a student’s subsequent academic performance.

Fact 5. Traditionally constructed standardized achievement tests can provide parents and teachers with useful information about a student’s relative performance levels (compared to other students).

Because a student’s relative standing typically doesn’t change rapidly, traditionally constructed standardized achievement tests need not be administered yearly to supply parents with this kind of comparative information.

Fact 6. Traditionally constructed standardized achievement tests—designed chiefly to compare a student’s test score with other students’ scores—should not be used to evaluate school quality.

Fact 7. Even though only about 25 percent of a student’s success in college is related to the student’s score on aptitude tests such as the ACT and SAT, parents should (1) still help their children prepare for those tests, but (2) avoid conveying a negative impression to a child whose test scores are not particularly high. There are many factors far more influential than aptitude-test scores in predicting a student’s college performance.

Fact 8. Performance tests [verses Fact #4 “Achievement” tests], although both difficult and costly to score, often yield the most valid inferences about a student’s mastery of many significant skills. When students generate an original response to an essay-writing task, we call this a performance test. Performance tests require students to construct their responses “from scratch” rather than merely selecting their responses from the already-presented options in multiple-choice items.

Fact 9. Although an individual student’s attitudes or interests are almost impossible to measure accurately, assessing such affective outcomes on a group-basis can provide accurate and powerful evidence of the quality of a school’s instructional program.

If parents set out to judge a school’s quality, they should look at lots more than mere test scores. For instance, are students genuinely excited about what they are learning? Do students really look forward to going to school? Are students gaining increased confidence in their ability to use the things they are learning in school? These are important questions, and their answers all revolve around the kind of affect being promoted in a school.

The use of self-report affective inventories—questionnaires completed anonymously by students—can supply educators and parents with important insights about students’ affect. When students’ anonymous responses to such inventories are pooled to be analyzed, the responses yield a reasonably accurate picture of the affective status of a student group. Thus, it is possible to obtain, at little cost, satisfactory estimates of group-affect dealing with such variables as students’ (1) perceived safety when at school, (2) interest in various school subjects, (3) attitudes toward learning, and (4) confidence in carrying out significant academic skills.

Fact 10. Because educational tests (both teacher-made classroom tests and commercially developed standardized tests) vary in their quality, it should not be assumed that every educational test is a good one. Today’s standardized tests, even those created by reputable test-development firms, will sometimes fail to be at the high quality level that those firms would prefer.

SOURCE: W. James Popham, Ed.D. is author of Testing! Testing! What Every Parent Should Know About School Tests (Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2000). He is professor emeritus at the University of California, Los Angeles

Consider This & Share

16 thoughts on “Standardized Tests

  1. Pingback: Accountability Where is Matters Most | The Crucial Voice of the People

  2. Pingback: Outcome-Based Education Reform | The Crucial Voice of the People

  3. Standardized tests are to gather psychometric data, personal information and evaluate teachers and schools. The information gathered on students is being shared by third parties who are creating data bases of information to evaluate what job the student will be forced to pursue in the future. This information will follow them the rest of their lives.

    • Thanks for posting, Virginia.

      You definitely described the way it is going these days. But there are / were ethical and unethical uses which the education industry has ignored and too many educators themselves were not taught – obviously.

      I wrote to try and make people aware that the time has come for America to make a choice that has not been made obvious. Thanks for working to do that. Keep speaking up!

      As one honest test company person said to me, “fight the good fight.” We must. Abusive and unethical testing practices must be stopped.

  4. Pingback: No Child Left Behind Accountability: A Joke - The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

  5. Pingback: Unethical Testing - The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

  6. Pingback: Test Refusal Justified - The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

  7. Pingback: Civil Disobedience - The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

  8. Pingback: The Common Core Conspiracy - The Crucial VoiceThe Crucial Voice

  9. Pingback: Test-Based Goals: Mission Accomplished? - The Crucial VoiceThe Crucial Voice

  10. Pingback: Distinguishing Truth from Deception - The Crucial VoiceThe Crucial Voice

  11. Pingback: Should You Opt Out - The Crucial VoiceThe Crucial Voice

  12. Pingback: Do We Need 95% of Students to Take Tests? - The Crucial VoiceThe Crucial Voice

  13. Pingback: 35 Years Adrift on an Ocean of Reforms - The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

  14. Pingback: Zombie Ideas Are Killing Public Education - The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

  15. Pingback: Accountability Where It Matters Most | The Crucial Voice of the PeopleThe Crucial Voice of the People

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *