Opportunity in America

As a nation, we demanded an accountability system for our public schools; President Bush gave us the accountability law “No Child Left Behind.” And he didn’t change it.

President Obama asked us to identify our lowest performing schools; we did. And the change we needed didn’t happen.

NOW, will we continue to allow the dismantling of the public education system —through the plans of well-financed lobbying groups— by keeping in place current policies that failed us. Will the country turn its back and walk away from “under-achieving schools”— knowing that the system failed to best serve a generation of students?

OR, will we fight like hell for the children left behind by the misguided decisions of our leaders?

It is our responsibility as a nation to not just identify and label schools, but to address the needs of our students throughout our land.

Despite what some want to believe, “equal educational opportunity” has never been offered in America. I believe that too many Americans have a hard time defining what it means and envisioning what it looks like. If I’m correct in that assumption, wouldn’t it make sense to stop rushing ahead without first establishing a vision for OUR education system?d894a74dd1d729fdd5438740d86b4b20

We can begin as a nation by going back to the idea of providing excellent education for all as envisioned by the creators of The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. It provides a framework for what we now need. We need federal education law that we can all read, understand, and be a part of executing effectively and efficiently.

Americans seem to understand that children living in poverty have unmet needs that directly affect their ability to learn — such as those expressed by President Kennedy —“poor diets, unaddressed speech, dental and visual disorders.”

Meeting known resource gaps between the children of the poor and those of higher socioeconomic classes was precisely the main focus of ESEA.

Americans seem to understand that in most communities there are children from a spectrum of socioeconomic backgrounds and that it isn’t fair to offer opportunity to one group while undercutting another. Equal opportunity means offering them all a fair shot at obtaining a quality public education. Isn’t that why most of us want a public education system to exist?

Meeting the grander twin goals of quality and equality in educational opportunity was the primary guiding principles, the original aim, of ESEA.

indexAmericans seem to understand that the educating of a child occurs in a variety of community settings, that each community is unique, and that it makes sense to use resources that already exist while recognizing the need for assistance when and where it is necessary.

Meeting the need for a wide range of learning opportunities within a community, based on the belief that community improvement leads to educational improvement, was the philosophical basis of ESEA.

Americans seem to understand that a public system of public education requires a strong public institution that is both responsive to ever-changing educational needs and responsible for continuous improvement to safeguard against institutional entrenchment.

Meeting the needs of this large and diverse nation requires that all public education personnel —the public servants of the system, from teachers to counselors to leadership at all levels— be well-educated, trained, and informed in order to strengthen and improve the functioning of the institution. That was the method by which ESEA could guide fulfillment of our duty to establish and ensure equal educational opportunity in America.

The vision and framework are historical.

What is necessary right now is for each of us to call or write our U.S. representatives and request they reinstate the original aim of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.Screen Shot 2015-01-14 at 3.52.56 PM

For America, this is what opportunity looks like.

The opportunity afforded us by the reauthorization of ESEA provides US with the chance to get it right.

(End note: A similar essay was published in Education News as ESEA and Opportunity in America )

8 thoughts on “Opportunity in America

  1. Unfortunately, there is a great number of Americans who will not support anything like equal educational opportunity for African Americans. These people are most numerous in the southern, former Confederate States but there are bigots all over the Country. Keep in mind that the ESEA was originally passed in 1965 over the loudly voiced objections of Senators and Representatives from all over the south. LBJ had to twist many arms and call in many favors to get it passed. It also passed on a groundswell of public support from the civil rights advocates.

    In addition to the traditional and expected bigots there is the widely accepted myth of Black inferiority. Many Americans who will speak out about equal opportunity secretly (or perhaps even subconsciously) believe that Whites are superior to everyone else and especially superior to African Americans.

    Unless there is a huge movement in support of what you advocate it faces a very tenuous future. I wish you the best and I am all for what you are for but I just do not see it happening in today’s political climate.

    • As always, I appreciate your honest assessment of the sad state of affairs in American politics. Your words are a reality check, for sure.

      I’ve never thought of myself as “a dreamer” but perhaps I am. Equal opportunity for children? It could happen.

      • I do not mean to bring you down. I definitely do not classify you as a dreamer and I hope you do not classify yourself that way either.

        I am a white man married to an African American woman. I guess this has sharpened my awareness of (and if I am truthful the bitterness toward) the racism that seems to be in the very DNA of White Americans.

        Recently a White friend from my high school graduating class sought to explain to me that the only reason local City Schools do so much worse than neighboring County schools is because the Cities have more Black students. This is a college educated man who knows I taught in Black elementary schools for over 40 years and am married to a black woman yet he saw nothing offensive in making such a remark to me. What is worse is that he truly believes it.

        I make my “downer comments” because I want to be helpful. I always hope someone will read them and have a suggestion for a way to get the needed momentum started. Please know I love what you write and hope it catches fire.

        • Never hesitate to tell me what you are thinking! Your voice is crucial and I hear you. Actually, rather than feeling down, it spurred me to pick up the phone, call both my senators, and I just finished a letter to one of their education advisers……light those fires!

          • Just read a great interview with Fulgani Sheth in the New York times. It is part of a series of article by Yancey ( I think first name is George). Sheth is the author of a book titled “Toward a Political Philosophy of Race>” I think it will go a long way toward explaining why efforts to close the achievement gap between Black and White students are not going to succeed until the problem is recognized as a systemic condition written into the philosophy of this country. I strongly recommend reading the interview.

          • It was very interesting and in line with…this journey. Thank you for suggesting it.

  2. Pingback: Concerns about the New ESEA Reauthorization

  3. Pingback: Put the brakes on the ESEA reauthorization bill | Seattle Education

Leave a Reply